Abstract

In the era of globalisation and internal transformation, the educational system must adapt to the emerging challenges, ensuring not only the imparting of knowledge, but also contributing to the holistic development of personality. The relevance of the present study lied the need to create an effective personality-developing educational environment for the growth of personality potential in the conditions of globalisation and internal transformation, socio-economic changes taking place in Kyrgyzstan. The purpose of this study was to determine the role of personality-developing educational environment in the shaping and development of personality potential in the context of Kyrgyzstan, to identify the key factors affecting the success of personal growth and self-development in various social groups. The study considered the issues of creating a coherent, adequate to the challenges of time personality-oriented educational environment, where all components would be systematically and purposefully connected: organisational-technological, subject-spatial, social. The principal areas and ways of creating personality-developing educational environment of educational organisations as an open self-developing educational system were covered. The study revealed the principal areas and methods of creating PDE. The significance of a systematic and purposeful approach that combines organisational-technological, subject-spatial, and social components was emphasised. The findings of this study can be used to develop recommendations for improving educational programmes and practices aimed at developing students’ personality potential. The study contributed to the understanding of the role of the educational environment in shaping a successful and adaptive personality capable of functioning effectively in the context of modern challenges

Keywords

personality-centred educational environment; PDE components; educational system; personal growth; educational environment

References

  1. Asmolov, A.G. (2015). Psychology of modernity: The challenges of uncertainty, complexity and diversity. Psychological Studies, 8(40), 1-11. doi: 10.54359/ps.v8i40.550.
  2. Baeva, I.A. (2005). Conceptual foundations and principles of creating psychological safety in the educational environment. In Psychology of education: Regional experience. Materials of the Second national scientific and practical conference (pp. 35-36). Moscow: All-Russian public organization “Federation of educational psychologists of Russia”.
  3. Bordovsky, G.A. (2012). Challenges of the modern education system for a school teacher. Professional Education in Russia and Abroad, 2(6), 6-10.
  4. Dubrovina, I.V. (2010). Psychology: Textbook. Moscow: Academia.
  5. Dubrovina, I.V., & Lubovsky, D.V. (2017). Developing psychological culture of schoolchildren as a means of supporting implementation of basic education standards. Psychological Science and Education, 22(6), 25-33. doi: 10.17759/pse.2017220602.
  6. Gordeeva, T.O. (2016). Motivation: New approaches, diagnostics, practical recommendations. Siberian Psychological Journal, 62, 38-53. doi: 10.17223/17267080/62/4.
  7. Gordeeva, T.O. (2017). Scales of internal and external academic motivation of schoolchildren. Psychological Science and Education, 22(2), 65-74. doi: 10.17223/17267080/62/4.
  8. Ivanova, I., & Martyniuk, I. (2024). Characteristics of the thinking style of student youth. Humanities Studios: Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, 12(4), 61-77. doi: 10.31548/hspedagog/4.2024.61.
  9. Khabieva, E.R. (2017). Psychological characteristics of trusting relationships of adolescent and young schoolchildren. (Doctoral dissertation, Jusup Balasagyn Kyrgyz National University, Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic).
  10. Kiryanova, M. (2024). The educator’s information and digital competence as a foundation for professional success in the context of the information and educational environment. Pedagogical Sciences, 27(2), 63-72. doi: 10.33989/25242474.2024.2.63.
  11. Korotenko, V.A., et al. (Eds.). (2021). Safety lessons: A teaching guide (2nd ed). Bishkek: BIOM.
  12. Law of the Kyrgyz Republic No. 179. “On Education”. (2023, August). Retrieved from https://cbd.minjust.gov.kg/43419/edition/1273902/ru.
  13. Leontiev, D.A. (2014). Psychology of choice: Personal prerequisites and personal consequences of choice. Psychological Journal, 35(6), 56-68. doi: 10.17223/17267080/62/3.
  14. Leontiev, D.A. (2016). Self-regulation, resources and personal potential. Siberian Psychological Journal, 62, 18-37. doi: 10.17223/17267080/62/3.
  15. Muratalieva, N.Kh. (2020). Reflection in the professional development of a future psychologist. Bulletin of Science and Practice, 6(11), 401-407. doi: 10.33619/2414-2948/60/50.
  16. Muratalieva, N.Kh., Kutanova, R.A., & Sukhodubova, N.A. (2024). Psychological and pedagogical features of the educational environment of schools in the Kyrgyz Republic. Scientific and Methodological Journal: Education Quality Management, 6, 3-9. doi: 10.33619/2414-2948/60/50.
  17. Polivanova, K.N. (2020). New educational discourse: The well-being of schoolchildren. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 16(4), 26-34. doi: 10.17759/chp.2020160403.
  18. Seligman, M. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  19. Yakimanskaya, I.S. (1996). Person-oriented learning in a modern school. Moscow: Sentiabr.
  20. Yasvin, V.Ya. (2018). Research of the educational environment in domestic psychology: From methodological discussions to empirical results. News of Saratov University. New series. Series Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 18(1), 80-88. doi: 10.18500/1819-7671-2018-18-1-80-90.
  21. Yasvin, V.Ya. (2019). School environment as an object of measurement: Examination, design management. Moscow: Narodnoe Obrazovanie.
  22. Yuan, Y., & Fang, L. (2016). Cultivating college students’ national culture identity based on English education. English Language Teaching Archives, 9(5), 192-196. doi: 10.5539/elt.v9n5p192.