Abstract
The relevance of this study is determined by the fact that biology has become one of the key subjects of STEM modernisation in China, as the country’s strategic priorities – biotechnology, medicine, genetics, food security, and ecology – are concentrated within this field. These national goals require a new model of biology education that is shifting from an exam-oriented system toward a research-based, interdisciplinary, and technologically enhanced learning environment. The purpose of the study was to analyse how the integration of STEM approaches, digitalisation, and Confucian cultural traditions jointly influence the teaching of biology in China and shape a unique hybrid educational model. The methodology was based on a qualitative comparative analysis of policy documents, curriculum standards, and scholarly publications by Chinese and international researchers, as well as a content analysis of reforms related to STEM integration, digital tools, and the transformation of pedagogical practices. The findings showed that biology has become central to STEM education not by accident but because it provides interdisciplinary links with medicine, chemistry, mathematics, engineering, and environmental science. It was established that Chinese schools and universities are increasingly adopting project-based learning, digital simulations, virtual laboratories, and the integration of biology with big-data analysis and engineering tasks. At the same time, Confucian values – discipline, respect for teachers, and moral norms – continue to shape interaction styles and student motivation, creating a balance between innovation and tradition. Additional systemic challenges were identified, including reduced laboratory practice, a shortage of teachers with research competencies, and digital inequality across regions. The practical significance of the study lies in its potential application in curriculum development, the modernisation of biology teaching, and the adaptation of STEM approaches in countries seeking to harmonise cultural traditions with innovative educational practices
Keywords
References
- Avci, H., Lunn, S.J., & Hazari, Z. (2025). Exploring STEM educators’ perspectives on the integration of AI-enabled technologies in teaching and learning. Computers and Education Open, 9, article number 100304. doi: 10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100304.
- China's Education Modernisation 2035 Plan. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-02/23/content_5367987.htm.
- Davis, J.P., Du, J., Tang, J.H., Qiao, L., Liu, Y.Q., & Chiang, F.K. (2020). Uniformity, diversity, harmony, and emotional energy in a Chinese STEM classroom. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, article number 44. doi: 10.1186/s40594-020-00232-5.
- Golegou, E., & Peppas, K. (2025). Approaches to Stem education around the world, what we can learn from them. NPRC Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(4), 160-178. doi: 10.3126/nprcjmr.v2i4.76925.
- Li, X., & Wei, F. (2023). What Confucian eco-ethics can teach us about solving the dilemma of interpreting the concept of sustainability. Religions, 14(9), article number 1216. doi: 10.3390/rel14091216.
- Liang, Y., & Matthews, K.E. (2022). Are Confucian educational values a barrier to engaging students as partners in Chinese universities? Higher Education Research & Development, 42(6), 1453-1466. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2022.2138276.
- Lin, S., Wang, J., Li, X., Tang, X., Sun, C., Tan, M., & Luo, T. (2023). Curriculum content mapping of the Chinese National Biology Curriculum Standards for middle school: An analysis from the OECD education 2030 perspective. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 5, article number 16. doi: 10.1186/s43031-023-00082-5.
- Lin, X., Luan, L., & Dai, Y. (2023). Exploring Chinese STEM college students’ expectations of effective online courses. International Journal of Chinese Education, 12(2). doi: 10.1177/2212585X231188977.
- Lukashevych, Yu., & Popozohlo, I. (2024). Development of vocational education in the context of globalisation and integration processes. Professional Education: Methodology, Theory and Technologies, 10(2), 33-44. doi: 10.69587/pemtt/2.2024.33.
- Ma, H., Liu, W., Liu, B., Lu, Y., & Li, G. (2025). Assessing engineering thinking in the context of biology among senior high school students in mainland China: Development and validation of a two-tier assessment scale and the relationship between self-efficacy and practical performance. Frontiers in Education, 10, article number 1591073. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1591073.
- Marinette, B., & Hui, X. (2021). The influence of Confucius’s educational thoughts on China’s educational system. Open Access Library Journal, 8, article number e7370. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1107370.
- Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2018). Education informatization 2.0 action plan. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.cn.
- Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2025). MOE outlines 2025 national strategy for digital education. Retrieved from http://en.moe.gov.cn/news/press_releases/202504/t20250403_1186060.html.
- Nguyen, P.T., Nguyen, K.N.V., Do, H.T.T., & Nguyen, Q.T. (2025). Confucian educational thought and its relevance to contemporary Vietnamese education. Philosophies, 10(3), article number 70. doi: 10.3390/philosophies10030070.
- Papaneophytou, C., & Nicolaou, S.A. (2025). Promoting critical thinking in biological sciences in the era of artificial intelligence: The role of higher education. Trends in Higher Education, 4(2), article number 24. doi: 10.3390/higheredu4020024.
- Peng, Y., Zhao, F., & Zheng, Y. (2025). Promoting equitable and high-quality STEM education in China from an ecological perspective. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 7, article number 8. doi: 10.1186/s43031-025-00127-x.
- Sipii, V., Kurtiak, F., Mykhaliuk, I., Hryhorchuk, I., & Zasiekina, T. (2024). Virtual laboratories as a means of increasing accessibility of biological education in Ukraine. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 12(4), 627-636. doi: 10.21533/pen.v12.i4.64.
- Tan, C. (2019). Beyond high-stakes exam: A neo-Confucian educational programme and its contemporary implications. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(2), 137-148. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2019.1605901.
- Thanh, D.T., Dinh, V.P., & Van, H.N. (2025). Exploring AI integration in biology self-learning: A TAM-based analysis among high school students in Ho Chi Minh City. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(10), article number em2716. doi: 10.29333/ejmste/17158.
- Tzafilkou, K., Perifanou, M., & Economides, A.A. (2022). STEM distance teaching: Investigating STEM teachers’ attitudes, barriers, and training needs. Education Sciences, 12(11), article number 790. doi: 10.3390/educsci12110790.
- Vаintrаub, M., Levchenko, I., & Lytvyn, A. (2025). Development of information and digital technologies in higher education institutions. Professional Education: Methodology, Theory and Technologies, 11(1), 70-79. doi: 0.69587/pemtt/1.2025.70.
- Wang, C. (2022). Resurgence of Confucian education in contemporary China: Parental involvement, moral anxiety, and the pedagogy of memorisation. Journal of Moral Education, 52(3), 325-342. doi: 10.1080/03057240.2022.2066639.
- Wei, X., Xu, T., Guo, R., Tan, Z., & Xin, W. (2024). Physiology education in China: The current situation and changes over the past 3 decades. BMC Medical Education, 24, article number 408. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05395-1
- Xiao, J., & Zhang, J. (2022). China's approach to digital transformation of higher education: Digital infrastructure and (open) educational resources. In V.I. Marín, L.N. Peters & O. Zawacki-Richter (Eds.), (Open) Educational resources around the world: An international comparison (pp. 107-169). Oldenburg: Center for Open Education Research.
- Yu, J., Li, C., & Li, G. (2022). Alignment between biology curriculum standards and five textbook editions: A content analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 44(14), 1-20. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2022.2119621.
- Županec, V., Radulović, B., & Lazarević, T. (2022). Instructional efficiency of STEM approach in biology teaching in primary school in Serbia. Sustainability, 14(24), article number 16416. doi: 10.3390/su142416416.