Аннотация
Целью исследования было определение эффективных подходов к развитию педагогической мотивации будущих учителей. Методология включала анализ педагогической мотивации и компетентностного подхода, проведение педагогического эксперимента с контрольной и экспериментальной группами; в рамках сценарного моделирования были выделены три сценария развития педагогической мотивации будущих учителей: активно-профессиональный, адаптивно-компетентностный и формально-ориентированный. Основные результаты исследования свидетельствовали об эффективности компетентностного подхода в формировании внутренней мотивации и профессиональной уверенности будущих учителей. В экспериментальной группе после внедрения элементов компетентностного обучения доля студентов с высоким уровнем мотивации статистически значимо (p < 0,01) увеличилась с 13-30 % до 48-56 % по ключевым показателям: интерес к освоению профессии, удовлетворенность выполнением учебных заданий, осознание социальной значимости педагогической деятельности, личностного смысла профессиональной подготовки, готовность к саморазвитию и совершенствованию педагогических умений и навыков. До эксперимента большинство учащихся демонстрировали среднюю или низкую уверенность в принятии педагогических решений (ответы «3» – 29-37 %, «5» – 11-20 %). После внедрения компетентностных практик в экспериментальной группе доля высоких оценок «5» по различным критериям увеличилась до 28-36 %, а низкие оценки практически исчезли. Прогресс был отмечен в случаях общения с родителями и повышения мотивации учащихся к обучению, где средний уровень оценок «4-5» превысил 65 %, тогда как в контрольной группе он составлял 30-40 %. Было установлено, что активное использование микропроектов, кейсов, ролевых игр и систематического рефлексирования сформировало внутреннюю мотивацию, повысило уровень компетентности и способствовало сознательному вовлечению студентов в педагогическую практику. Кроме того, в ходе исследования были выделены три сценария развития педагогической мотивации: активно-профессиональный, адаптивно-компетентностный и формально-ориентированный. Практическая значимость работы заключается в возможности использования полученных результатов в учреждениях педагогического образования для разработки дифференцированных траекторий обучения
Ключевые слова
Использованные источники
- Akbulut, S.M., & Hill, J.R. (2020). Case-based pedagogy for teacher education: An instructional model. Contemporary Educational Technology, 12(2), article number ep287. doi: 10.30935/cedtech/8937.
- Ali, J.K., Shamsan, M.A., Hezam, T.A., & Mohammed, A.A. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learning motivation: Teachers and students’ voices. Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix, 2(1), 41-49. doi: 10.56540/jesaf.v2i1.51.
- American Sociological Association’ Code of Ethics. (2018, June). Retrieved from https://www.asanet.org/about/ethics/.
- Anwar, K., Asari, S., Husniah, R., Asmara, C.H. (2021). Students’ perceptions of collaborative team teaching and student achievement motivation. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 325-344. doi: 10.29333/iji.2021.14119a.
- Asmus, E.P. (2021). Motivation in music teaching and learning. Visions of Research in Music Education, 16(5), article number 31.
- Bardach, L., & Klassen, R.M. (2021). Teacher motivation and student outcomes: Searching for the signal. Educational Psychologist, 56(4), 283-297. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2021.1991799.
- Beardsley, M., Albó, L., Aragón, P., & Hernández‐Leo, D. (2021). Emergency education effects on teacher abilities and motivation to use digital technologies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1455-1477. doi: 10.1111/bjet.13101.
- Campillo-Ferrer, J.M., & Miralles-Martínez, P. (2021). Effectiveness of the flipped classroom model on students’ self-reported motivation and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), article number 176. doi: 10.1057/s41599-021-00860-4.
- Díaz-Noguera, M.D., Hervás-Gómez, C., De la Calle-Cabrera, A.M., & López-Meneses, E. (2022). Autonomy, motivation, and digital pedagogy are key factors in the perceptions of Spanish higher-education students toward online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(2), article number 654. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020654.
- Ekmekci, A., & Serrano, D.M. (2022). The impact of teacher quality on student motivation, achievement, and persistence in science and mathematics. Education Sciences, 12(10), article number 649. doi: 10.3390/educsci12100649.
- Fiddiyasari, A., & Pustika, R. (2021). Students’ motivation in English online learning during COVID-19 pandemic at SMA Muhammadiyah Gadingrejo. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 57-61.
- Forson, J.A., Ofosu-Dwamena, E., Opoku, R.A., & Adjavon, S.E. (2021). Employee motivation and job performance: A study of basic school teachers in Ghana. Future Business Journal, 7(1), article number 30. doi: 10.1186/s43093-021-00077-6.
- Gómez-Trigueros, I.M., Ruiz-Bañuls, M., Esteve-Faubel, J.M., & Mareque León, F. (2024). Teacher motivation: Exploring the integration of technology and didactics in the narratives of future teachers. Social Sciences, 13(4), article number 217. doi: 10.3390/socsci13040217.
- Hartono, H., Hidayati, N., & Wiyaka, W. (2022). Pre‑service English teachers’ motivation to pursue a career in teaching viewed from speaking self‑efficacy. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(1), 517-526. doi: 10.11591/ijere.v12i1.23358.
- Holubnycha, L., Shchokina, T., Soroka, N., & Besarab, T. (2022). Development of competency-based approach to education. Educational Challenges, 27(2), 54-65. doi: 10.34142/2709-7986.2022.27.2.04.
- Humeniuk, I., Mushenyk, I., Chaikovska, O., & Humeniuk, O. (2022). Motivation enhancement of future engineering teacher by means of pedagogical support. In Proceedings of 21st international scientific conference “Engineering for rural development” (pp. 426-431). Jelgava: Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies. doi: 10.22616/ERDev.2022.21.TF147.
- Izhhar, N.I., Zainal, N., Ismail, F.E., & Yahya, M.Y. (2025). Pre‑service teacher’s motivation in English language learning: A literature review. Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(3), 396-405. doi: 10.55197/qjssh.v6i3.684.
- Karasievych, S., et al. (2021). Training future physical education teachers for physical and sports activities: Neuropedagogical approach. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 12(4), 543-564. doi: 10.18662/brain/12.4/264.
- Khazen, M., Asli, S., Hofstein, A., & Hugerat, M. (2025). Effect of an educational initiative for sustainability on pre-service teachers’ ethical decision-making skills, motivation to learn science, and learning atmosphere in the classroom. Sustainability, 17(3), article number 992. doi: 10.3390/su17030992.
- Kosholap, A., Maksymchuk, B., Branitska, T., Martynets, L., Boichenko, A., Stoliarenko, O., Matsuk, L., Surovov, O., Stoliarenko, O., & Maksymchuk, I. (2021). Neuropsychological bases of self-improvement of own physical health of future teachers in the course of university education. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 12(3), 171-190. doi: 10.18662/brain/12.3/226.
- Levin, B.B. (1995). Using the case method in teacher education: The role of discussion and experience in teachers’ thinking about cases. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 63-79. doi: 10.1016/0742-051X(94)00013-V.
- Li, Z., & Guo, W.Y. (2024). Pre‑service teachers’ altruistic motivation for choosing teaching as a career: Where does it come from? Frontiers in Psychology, 15, article number 1334470. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1334470.
- Lorente-Echeverría, S., Canales-Lacruz, I., & Murillo-Pardo, B. (2022). The vision of future primary school teachers as to education for sustainable development from a competency-based approach. Sustainability, 14(18), article number 11267. doi: 10.3390/su141811267.
- Mahmoodi, M.H., & Yousefi, M. (2021). Second language motivation research 2010-2019: A synthetic exploration. Language Learning Journal, 50(3), 273-296. doi: 10.1080/09571736.2020.1869809.
- Marcellis, M., Frerejean, J., Bredeweg, B., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J.J. (2024). Motivating students in competency-based education programmes: Designing blended learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 27, 761-776. doi: 10.1007/s10984-024-09500-5.
- Mateos-Moreno, D. (2022). Why (not) be a music teacher? Exploring pre-service music teachers’ sources of concern regarding their future profession. International Journal of Music Education, 40(4), 489-501. doi: 10.1177/02557614211073138.
- Mirza, C., Teymoori, H., & Mirza, H. (2023). Teachers’ perspectives on the competency-based approach: Assessing readiness for a new educational reform. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(9), 241-260. doi: 10.26803/ijlter.22.9.13.
- Mohzana, M. (2025). The impact of competency‑based pedagogy on students’ motivation and engagement: An experimental study. Journal Emerging Technologies in Education, 3(2), 87-96. doi: 10.70177/jete.v3i2.2193.
- Nombo, U. (2022). Competency-based curriculum in the teachers colleges: The challenges. European Journal of Alternative Education Studies, 7(1), 56-71. doi: 10.46827/ejae.v7i1.4179.
- Pekrun, R. (2021). Teachers need more than knowledge: Why motivation, emotion, and self-regulation are indispensable. Educational Psychologist, 56(4), 312-322. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2021.1991356.
- Rogers, A.P. (2021). Exploring secondary teachers’ perspectives on implementing competency‐based education. The Journal of Competency‐Based Education, 6(4), 222-232. doi: 10.1002/cbe2.1265.
- Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. University of Rochester, 55(1), 68-78. doi: 10.1037110003-066X.55.1.68.
- Schukajlow, S., Rakoczy, K., & Pekrun, R. (2023). Emotions and motivation in mathematics education: Where we are today and where we need to go. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 55(2), 249-267. doi: 10.1007/s11858-022-01463-2.
- Segers, M., Martens, R., & Van den Bossche, P. (2008). Understanding how a case-based assessment instrument influences student teachers’ learning approaches. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1751-1764. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.022.
- Suyatno, S., Wantini, W., & Patimah, L. (2024). Intrinsic motivation of gen Z to be a teacher in elementary schools. Futurity Education, 4(3), 169-181. doi: 10.57125/FED.2024.09.25.10.
- Vallerand, R.J., Blais, M.R., Brière, N.M., & Pelletier, L.G. (1989). Construction and validation of the academic motivation scale (AMS). Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 21, 323-349.
- Xu, C., Gao, L., Zhang, S., Zhang, J., Li, C., Zhang, D., Pan, Y., & Liu, J. (2022). Motivations and future plans of the final year students in a Chinese dental school. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 90. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03156-6.
- Yildiz, I., Topcu, E., & Kaymakci, S. (2021). The effect of gamification on motivation in the education of pre-service social studies teachers. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, article number 100907. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100907.
- Zheng, J. (2021). A functional review of research on clarity, immediacy, and credibility of teachers and their impacts on motivation and engagement of students. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, article number 712419. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.712419.