Abstract

The purpose of the study was to determine effective approaches to the development of the pedagogical motivation of future teachers. The methodology included an analysis of pedagogical motivation and the competence-based approach, the implementation of a pedagogical experiment with control and experimental groups; within scenario modelling three scenarios for the development of the pedagogical motivation of future teachers were distinguished, namely an active-professional, an adaptive-competence-based and a formally-oriented scenario. The main results of the study indicated the effectiveness of a competence-oriented approach in forming the internal motivation and professional confidence of future teachers. In the experimental group, after the introduction of elements of competence-based learning, the proportion of students with a high level of motivation increased statistically significantly (p < 0.01) from 13-30% to 48-56% according to key indicators: interest in mastering the profession, satisfaction with the performance of learning tasks, awareness of the social significance of pedagogical activity, the personal meaning of professional training, readiness for self-development and for improving pedagogical abilities and skills. Before the experiment, most students demonstrated medium or low confidence in making pedagogical decisions (responses “3” – 29-37%, “5” – 11-20%). After the introduction of competence-based practices in the experimental group, the share of high scores “5” increased to 28-36% according to different criteria, and low scores almost disappeared. Progress was observed in the cases on communication with parents and on increasing pupils’ learning motivation, where the average level of scores “4-5” exceeded 65%, whereas in the control group it was 30-40%. It was established that the active use of micro-projects, cases, role-playing games and systematic reflection formed internal motivation, increased the level of competence and facilitated the conscious involvement of students in pedagogical practice. In addition, the study distinguished three scenarios for the development of pedagogical motivation, namely an active-professional, an adaptive-competence-based and a formally-oriented scenario. The practical significance of the work lies in the possibility of using the obtained results in institutions of teacher education for the development of differentiated learning trajectories

Keywords

professional orientation; internal interest; social significance; practical activity; professional readiness

References

  1. Akbulut, S.M., & Hill, J.R. (2020). Case-based pedagogy for teacher education: An instructional model. Contemporary Educational Technology, 12(2), article number ep287. doi: 10.30935/cedtech/8937.
  2. Ali, J.K., Shamsan, M.A., Hezam, T.A., & Mohammed, A.A. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learning motivation: Teachers and students’ voices. Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix, 2(1), 41-49. doi: 10.56540/jesaf.v2i1.51.
  3. American Sociological Association’ Code of Ethics. (2018, June). Retrieved from https://www.asanet.org/about/ethics/.
  4. Anwar, K., Asari, S., Husniah, R., Asmara, C.H. (2021). Students’ perceptions of collaborative team teaching and student achievement motivation. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 325-344. doi: 10.29333/iji.2021.14119a.
  5. Asmus, E.P. (2021). Motivation in music teaching and learning. Visions of Research in Music Education, 16(5), article number 31.
  6. Bardach, L., & Klassen, R.M. (2021). Teacher motivation and student outcomes: Searching for the signal. Educational Psychologist, 56(4), 283-297. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2021.1991799.
  7. Beardsley, M., Albó, L., Aragón, P., & Hernández‐Leo, D. (2021). Emergency education effects on teacher abilities and motivation to use digital technologies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1455-1477. doi: 10.1111/bjet.13101.
  8. Campillo-Ferrer, J.M., & Miralles-Martínez, P. (2021). Effectiveness of the flipped classroom model on students’ self-reported motivation and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), article number 176. doi: 10.1057/s41599-021-00860-4.
  9. Díaz-Noguera, M.D., Hervás-Gómez, C., De la Calle-Cabrera, A.M., & López-Meneses, E. (2022). Autonomy, motivation, and digital pedagogy are key factors in the perceptions of Spanish higher-education students toward online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(2), article number 654. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020654.
  10. Ekmekci, A., & Serrano, D.M. (2022). The impact of teacher quality on student motivation, achievement, and persistence in science and mathematics. Education Sciences, 12(10), article number 649. doi: 10.3390/educsci12100649.
  11. Fiddiyasari, A., & Pustika, R. (2021). Students’ motivation in English online learning during COVID-19 pandemic at SMA Muhammadiyah Gadingrejo. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 57-61.
  12. Forson, J.A., Ofosu-Dwamena, E., Opoku, R.A., & Adjavon, S.E. (2021). Employee motivation and job performance: A study of basic school teachers in Ghana. Future Business Journal, 7(1), article number 30. doi: 10.1186/s43093-021-00077-6.
  13. Gómez-Trigueros, I.M., Ruiz-Bañuls, M., Esteve-Faubel, J.M., & Mareque León, F. (2024). Teacher motivation: Exploring the integration of technology and didactics in the narratives of future teachers. Social Sciences, 13(4), article number 217. doi: 10.3390/socsci13040217.
  14. Hartono, H., Hidayati, N., & Wiyaka, W. (2022). Pre‑service English teachers’ motivation to pursue a career in teaching viewed from speaking self‑efficacy. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(1), 517-526. doi: 10.11591/ijere.v12i1.23358.
  15. Holubnycha, L., Shchokina, T., Soroka, N., & Besarab, T. (2022). Development of competency-based approach to education. Educational Challenges, 27(2), 54-65. doi: 10.34142/2709-7986.2022.27.2.04.
  16. Humeniuk, I., Mushenyk, I., Chaikovska, O., & Humeniuk, O. (2022). Motivation enhancement of future engineering teacher by means of pedagogical support. In Proceedings of 21st international scientific conference “Engineering for rural development” (pp. 426-431). Jelgava: Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies. doi: 10.22616/ERDev.2022.21.TF147.
  17. Izhhar, N.I., Zainal, N., Ismail, F.E., & Yahya, M.Y. (2025). Pre‑service teacher’s motivation in English language learning: A literature review. Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(3), 396-405. doi: 10.55197/qjssh.v6i3.684.
  18. Karasievych, S., et al. (2021). Training future physical education teachers for physical and sports activities: Neuropedagogical approach. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 12(4), 543-564. doi: 10.18662/brain/12.4/264.
  19. Khazen, M., Asli, S., Hofstein, A., & Hugerat, M. (2025). Effect of an educational initiative for sustainability on pre-service teachers’ ethical decision-making skills, motivation to learn science, and learning atmosphere in the classroom. Sustainability, 17(3), article number 992. doi: 10.3390/su17030992.
  20. Kosholap, A., Maksymchuk, B., Branitska, T., Martynets, L., Boichenko, A., Stoliarenko, O., Matsuk, L., Surovov, O., Stoliarenko, O., & Maksymchuk, I. (2021). Neuropsychological bases of self-improvement of own physical health of future teachers in the course of university education. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 12(3), 171-190. doi: 10.18662/brain/12.3/226.
  21. Levin, B.B. (1995). Using the case method in teacher education: The role of discussion and experience in teachers’ thinking about cases. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 63-79. doi: 10.1016/0742-051X(94)00013-V.
  22. Li, Z., & Guo, W.Y. (2024). Pre‑service teachers’ altruistic motivation for choosing teaching as a career: Where does it come from? Frontiers in Psychology, 15, article number 1334470. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1334470.
  23. Lorente-Echeverría, S., Canales-Lacruz, I., & Murillo-Pardo, B. (2022). The vision of future primary school teachers as to education for sustainable development from a competency-based approach. Sustainability, 14(18), article number 11267. doi: 10.3390/su141811267.
  24. Mahmoodi, M.H., & Yousefi, M. (2021). Second language motivation research 2010-2019: A synthetic exploration. Language Learning Journal, 50(3), 273-296. doi: 10.1080/09571736.2020.1869809.
  25. Marcellis, M., Frerejean, J., Bredeweg, B., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J.J. (2024). Motivating students in competency-based education programmes: Designing blended learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 27, 761-776. doi: 10.1007/s10984-024-09500-5.
  26. Mateos-Moreno, D. (2022). Why (not) be a music teacher? Exploring pre-service music teachers’ sources of concern regarding their future profession. International Journal of Music Education, 40(4), 489-501. doi: 10.1177/02557614211073138.
  27. Mirza, C., Teymoori, H., & Mirza, H. (2023). Teachers’ perspectives on the competency-based approach: Assessing readiness for a new educational reform. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(9), 241-260. doi: 10.26803/ijlter.22.9.13.
  28. Mohzana, M. (2025). The impact of competency‑based pedagogy on students’ motivation and engagement: An experimental study. Journal Emerging Technologies in Education, 3(2), 87-96. doi: 10.70177/jete.v3i2.2193.
  29. Nombo, U. (2022). Competency-based curriculum in the teachers colleges: The challenges. European Journal of Alternative Education Studies, 7(1), 56-71. doi: 10.46827/ejae.v7i1.4179.
  30. Pekrun, R. (2021). Teachers need more than knowledge: Why motivation, emotion, and self-regulation are indispensable. Educational Psychologist, 56(4), 312-322. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2021.1991356.
  31. Rogers, A.P. (2021). Exploring secondary teachers’ perspectives on implementing competency‐based education. The Journal of Competency‐Based Education, 6(4), 222-232. doi: 10.1002/cbe2.1265.
  32. Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. University of Rochester, 55(1), 68-78. doi: 10.1037110003-066X.55.1.68.
  33. Schukajlow, S., Rakoczy, K., & Pekrun, R. (2023). Emotions and motivation in mathematics education: Where we are today and where we need to go. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 55(2), 249-267. doi: 10.1007/s11858-022-01463-2.
  34. Segers, M., Martens, R., & Van den Bossche, P. (2008). Understanding how a case-based assessment instrument influences student teachers’ learning approaches. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1751-1764. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.022.
  35. Suyatno, S., Wantini, W., & Patimah, L. (2024). Intrinsic motivation of gen Z to be a teacher in elementary schools. Futurity Education, 4(3), 169-181. doi: 10.57125/FED.2024.09.25.10.
  36. Vallerand, R.J., Blais, M.R., Brière, N.M., & Pelletier, L.G. (1989). Construction and validation of the academic motivation scale (AMS). Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 21, 323-349.
  37. Xu, C., Gao, L., Zhang, S., Zhang, J., Li, C., Zhang, D., Pan, Y., & Liu, J. (2022). Motivations and future plans of the final year students in a Chinese dental school. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 90. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03156-6.
  38. Yildiz, I., Topcu, E., & Kaymakci, S. (2021). The effect of gamification on motivation in the education of pre-service social studies teachers. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, article number 100907. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100907.
  39. Zheng, J. (2021). A functional review of research on clarity, immediacy, and credibility of teachers and their impacts on motivation and engagement of students. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, article number 712419. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.712419.