Abstract

This article examines the function of the phenomenon of connotation, relating to the meaning of the word, in cognitive studies due to the national worldview, cultural characteristics. The place of the word water as a concept in the linguistic consciousness of the Kyrgyz is established with the support of scientific-theoretical studies of scientists. It is reported that the concept is the object of linguocognitive and linguоcultural research, reflecting the mental signs of consciousness by linguistic and non-linguistic means. The concept "water", as an anthropomorphic sign, is a metaphor, a symbol denoting the character, appearance, behavior of a person. Their connotative meanings are proved on the basis of fact-materials. Connotative meaning of the concept "water" is interpreted on the basis of stable language means, phraseological expressions and proverbs of the Kyrgyz language. According to the results of the study, it is noted that transitive, figurative, expressive meanings, in which the word water participates, are rich materials, which serve as the basis for the study as a concept. It is proved that the expression of the mental knowledge about the water in the linguistic consciousness by language means indicates the Kyrgyz national worldview, the peculiarities of the worldview of the nation

Keywords

connotation, concept, linguoculturology, cognition, language consciousness, mentality, metaphor, symbol

References

  1. Askoldov, S. A. (1997). Concept and word. In Russian Literature: From Theory of Literature to the Structure of the Text. Anthology (pp. 267–269). Moscow.

  2. Bavdinev, R. R. (2005). Cultural connotation and paremiological units. Bulletin of KazNU. Philological Series, (8), 177–180.

  3. Vorkachyov, S. G. (2002). Methodological foundations of linguoconceptology. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, (3), 79–95.

  4. Goverdovsky, V. I. (1985). Dialectics of connotation and denotation: Interaction of emotional and rational in the lexicon. Problems of Linguistics, (2), 71–79.

  5. Dalabaeva, G. M. (2006). Value concepts and methods of their explication in the linguistic worldview (PhD dissertation in philological sciences). Almaty.

  6. Isaev, D. (n.d.). Mysteries of the names of land and water. Frunze: Mektep. 152 p.

  7. Komlev, N. G. (1969). Components of the semantic structure of the word. Moscow: Moscow University Press.

  8. Marazykov, T. S. (2020). Literary text: Issues of analysis and teaching. Monograph. Bishkek.

  9. Maslova, V. A. (2001). Linguoculturology: Textbook for university students. Moscow.

  10. Metaphor in language and text (Ed. V. N. Telia). (1988). Moscow: Nauka.

  11. Nenasheva, T. A. (2012). Connotative semantics of referentially unambiguous names: Monograph. Nizhny Novgorod.

  12. Collection of proverbs (Comp. Zh. Koichumanov). (2011). Bishkek.

  13. Stepanov, Yu. S. (1997). Constants: Dictionary of Russian culture. Research experience. Moscow: Language of Russian Culture.

  14. Telia, V. N. (1986). The connotative aspect of the semantics of nominative units. USSR Academy of Sciences, Institute of Linguistics. Moscow: Nauka.

  15. Uali, N. (2007). Theoretical foundations of Kazakh speech culture (Doctoral dissertation in philology). Almaty.

  16. Phraseological Dictionary of the Kyrgyz Language (Comp. Zh. Osmonova, K. Konkobaev, Sh. Zhaparov). (2015). Bishkek: Imak Offset.