Abstract

This article examines the issue of parliamentary control over the intelligence services in Kyrgyzstan and world practice in this area. The author analyzes the main aspects of parliamentary control over the activities of intelligence services, the main problems and challenges faced by parliamentary committees on national security issues in Kyrgyzstan, and also examines the control mechanisms used in foreign countries. Consideration of this topic is important for ensuring transparency and responsibility of intelligence services to society, improving existing standards for exercising control over intelligence services, which have not been subject to radical reform

Keywords

parliament; intelligence services; national security; control; law

References

  1. Kuznetsov, S.A. (Ed.). (1998). Large explanatory dictionary of the Russian language. St. Petersburg: Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Linguistic Studies.
  2. Redkous, V.M. (n.d.). Problems of legislative support for national security of the CIS member states.
  3. Tarasova, M.A. (2008). Security agencies in the mechanism of the Russian state. Citizen and Law, 10, 37.
  4. Shurlov, S.A. (2013). Main Directorate of Imperial Security (RSHA).
  5. Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces. (2003). Intelligence services and democratic control – a professional perspective. Bulletin, 3, 2.
  6. Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://ru.wikibrief.org/wiki/Intelligence_and_Security_Committee_of_Parliament.
  7. Grachev, S.I., & Ivanov, N.A. (n.d.). History of formation and key features in the practice of French intelligence services.
  8. Ministry of Justice of Japan. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.moj.go.jp/EN/kouanshin/kouanshinsa_index.html.