Abstract

The main priority of a truly democratic legal state is the recognition of the interests and freedoms of the individual, their comprehensive and broad constitutional and, subsequently, legislative proclamation, consolidation and, possibly, full real provision. The Constitution acts as the foundation of the entire legal system of Kazakhstan, which contains all the achievements of human civilization, which are the most valuable and effective legal provisions for the administrative self-government of society. Law can advance and be ahead of the level of political development of society. This is an example of active reform of the legal system and the influence of international law. Legal science itself and jurists themselves are unlikely to set themselves the goal of a distorted interpretation of legal phenomena. They are encouraged to take the path of class and party explanation by political imperatives, while the position of legal science in clarifying scientific truth should not differ in any way from the position of the court, which is obliged to maintain objectivity, regardless of personal likes and dislikes, which should become one of the main legal cultural imperatives that correspond to natural nature legal phenomena

Keywords

constitution; legal system; school of natural law; universal human values; global society; state and law; normativist understanding of law; legal science

References

  1. Engiard, I. (1987). Law and religion in Israel. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 35(1), 187-195.
  2. Nenovski, N. (1982). Unity and interaction of state and law. Moscow.
  3. Sorokin, V.V. (2012). Law and time: Legal system and transitional time. Jurisprudence, 1, 180-189.
  4. Lazarev, V.V. (Ed.). (1996). General theory of law and state: Textbook (2nd ed.). Moscow: Jurist.
  5. Kalachyan, K.K. (2003). Economic integration of the member states of the Commonwealth of Independent States in the context of globalization of the world economy: International legal problems. (Doctoral dissertation, Moscow, Russia).
  6. Sanson, M. (2008). International law and global governance. London.
  7. Stepanenko, S.M. (2006). Administrative-legal aspects of interstate customs integration in the Eurasian Economic Community. Moscow.
  8. Skurko, E.V. (2003). Effectiveness of legal regulation of international trade and economic integration: Issues of theory and practice. Moscow: Jurist.